ORLANDO ADVERTISING · SERVICES

Find the website problems worth fixing first.

Get a clear explanation of what is making your website harder to use and which improvements deserve attention first. We review the important pages, phone experience, search basics and contact steps so you can choose a focused repair, better content or a larger redesign.

Discuss a website review

When this could be a good fit

You are considering a redesign but want to understand the actual problems first.
Customers struggle with the website, but you do not know where to start.
You have an automated report and need help separating useful findings from low-priority items.
You want a clear list of what was checked, what is uncertain and what to do next.

Start with the problem you want to solve

Tell us what the website should help customers do. Perhaps people cannot tell which service to choose, struggle to contact you on a phone or ask questions the site should already answer. You may also want to understand whether a proposed redesign is worth doing.

We use that question to choose the pages and customer tasks to review. A service page and its inquiry form may matter more than a large collection of low-priority articles. The proposal defines the review, price and report format before work starts.

Review the pages customers rely on

We look at whether the pages explain your services, coverage and next step clearly. Navigation, headings and links should help a visitor find the right information. On a phone, the text, menus and forms need to remain usable.

The review can also check search basics such as descriptive page titles, links to important pages and obstacles that keep content from being reached. If a problem needs information from your search account, website platform or hosting provider, the report identifies what access would resolve it.

Turn each finding into a useful action

A finding should tell you what happened, where it happened and how it affects the customer. It then gives a recommended action and a priority. A broken contact route deserves attention before an optional wording improvement.

For example, a service page might leave customers unsure whether you cover their address. The report could recommend adding a clear coverage explanation beside the inquiry button, with your team confirming the area and exceptions first. That turns a vague instruction to improve the page into work someone can carry out.

Put automated scores in context

Tools such as PageSpeed Insights can help investigate slow or unstable pages. Its simulated tests and available real-user data describe different conditions. We explain the relevant findings alongside the practical task a customer is trying to complete.

An automated accessibility score does not cover every check. We identify the checks included in your review and any issue that needs a specialist assessment. Our dated website-quality report, linked below, shows how we document checks on Orlando Advertising’s own site.

Check what happens after a contact button

The review follows the agreed path from a service page to the contact step. Can the visitor understand the form, correct an error and see what happens next?

When a submission test is included, we use clearly labeled test information and confirm with the intended recipient that the request arrived. If we only inspect the visible page, the report says that receipt still needs checking. This helps distinguish a confusing form from a delivery problem.

Choose a sensible next step

The report can support a small repair, a writing project, a redesign or a decision to leave a working area alone. It separates urgent issues from useful improvements and items that need more information.

You can ask us to quote the recommended changes or use the findings with your existing provider. Implementation and ongoing monitoring are agreed separately. This website review does not include a security penetration test, formal accessibility certification or legal advice.

What the work can include

A review of the agreed pages and customer tasks.
A plain-language report with evidence for the issues found.
A priority for each recommended change and a reason it matters.
Questions or account access needed to resolve uncertain findings.
Recommended next steps for repairs, writing or redesign.

We agree on deliverables, responsibilities, timing and price before starting.

Questions before we start

Will the audit tell us to replace the website?

Only if the findings support that recommendation. Clearer copy, a repaired form or a navigation change may solve the problem. We explain why the recommended work matters.

Can you begin without access to our accounts?

Yes. We can agree a review of the public pages. Search reports, hosting settings and confirmation that inquiries arrive need the relevant access or help from your team. The report identifies which checks were completed.

Does the price include fixing the issues?

The proposal makes that clear. A review can be purchased as a findings report, with implementation quoted separately. If fixes are included, the proposal names them.

Can we give the report to our current developer?

Yes. The purpose is to make the findings and recommended actions understandable. We agree the handover format before starting.

Does a high automated score mean the site works well for everyone?

No. It describes the checks that tool performed. A useful review also considers the pages and tasks customers need, and identifies any further manual or specialist assessment required.

Understand the approach

Other ways we can help

Explore a local project plan

Explore how the service can support businesses in different Central Florida communities.

Browse all service areas →

Sources and context

Source guidance checked October 21, 2026.